I bought this ribbon microphone because it was recommended by a friendly studio. The main reason was to try the microphone on a flugelhorn player which was going to record his first solo album.
The first thing we did was to compare this microphone to the others in my collection to pick the best for the job. Among its competitors were Neumann TLM103, TLM193, KM183, KM184, Rode NT2a, NT1, M3, AKG P100. A broad range of different microphones, in build type as in price. I taped all the brand names and markings to make the choice based on the hear and not on the eye. Although any engineer will pick out the microphones by eye without the marking quite easily, the musician would not. But not being retarded completely, he heard about the big names in the microphone world but does not know how they look...
Comparing to this set, the ribbon was a little dull. This is of course not that strange, as it was my main reason to set it up along side. And because I expected it also to be fuller of sound, perhaps warmer or something similar.
In the end, the R102 was not chosen. The final draw was between the M3, TLM193 and the NT2a. The latter won and was finally used in the production. The main reason was, as said before that the NT2a was much clearer and opener. The R102 was dull and lacking 'air/high end'.
I will end up using the R102 nevertheless on another project. Probably where the more dull sound is really wanted (for instance on an euphonium, tuba or on a harsh trumpet player) but I did not yet try this.
Would I buy the microphone again? I find it a difficult question. I would not buy it again knowing how it sounds now when the flugelhorn comes into mind. But it is certainly a nice addition to any microphone collection and from that point of view and keeping the price in mind I would consider it again!